FLEXUM

Flexible operation of electrolyzers for minimal degradation using monitoring

Project area

Resource procurement (Input)
Fuel production
Refining and upgrading
Storage
Transport
Distribution
Utilisation
Post-treatment and recycling
Safety and standardisation
Systems integration / sector coupling
Community work and stakeholder involvement
Structural frameworks, regulation, and markets

All projects in the MissionGreenFuels project portfolio contribute to the green transition across the green fuels value chain and cross-cutting themes. The highlighted icons indicate the area this project contributes to. Click on the icons to lean more.

Project description

Electrolyzers must have the capability to operate flexibly to meet the demand in a grid with fluctuating renewables. Furthermore, the cost of electrolyzers should be reduced for a more affordable and swifter green transition. The cost of the electrolyzer plants can be significantly reduced by increasing the lifetime of the electrolyzer stacks.

Project facts

Total budget of the project including co-financing
0 million DKK

Project start

September 2025

Project status

Active

Funding pool

Pool 2.5

Inflection point

Achieving cost parity

Value chain and theme

Fuel productionSystems integration / sector coupling

Project objectives

The needed flexible operation of electrolyzers...

The needed flexible operation of electrolyzers towards renewable grid integration is in this project seized as an opportunity to extend the lifetime and hereby the sustainability of the electrolyzer technology. The hypothesis is that by intelligently controlling the loading and unloading of individual electrolysis stacks it is possible to extend average lifetime of the electrolyzers, resulting in a greater hydrogen output and value creation.

The intelligent control requires monitoring of the state of health (SoH) of the individual electrolysis stacks in the system. Using state-of-the-art (SoA) monitoring hardware for every stack is however expensive.

This research project will develop intelligent control of electrolysis stacks by monitoring their SoH by inexpensive hardware. The cheaper hardware (power supply and controller) will be designed in WP1. The cheaper monitoring hardware will be enabled by overlaying minimized data acquisition with intelligence from multi-physics and multi-scale models developed in WP2. WP2 will also explore the possible data reduction (equipment cost reduction) at lab scale, where detailed measurements with expensive hardware can be made for validation.

The intelligent controller will be developed in WP3 based on the signals recorded from a virtual large-scale plant (simulating variable degradation in a full plant of many stacks operating in parallel). The approach will be used to determine which of the proposed hardware (WP1) and software (WP2) combinations provides the most cost-effective solution, i.e. where the cost of the specific monitoring solution is out-balanced the most by increased hydrogen production through extended lifetime.

The scaling to stacks and in-field deployment will be tested on a large-scale (TRL 6) setup in (WP4). Here the best hardware (WP1) and software (WP2) will be tested (as selected in WP3).

Impact & outcome

This project will contribute with the following results outlining the potential future development of sustainable use of biomass in the fully decarbonized society:

  • If the targeted monitoring and intelligent control can be successfully deployed and hereby extend the lifetime of the stacks by >20 %, this would lead to corresponding major cost reductions and reduction of material usage for the purpose.
  • Monitoring enables predictive maintenance. The global wind turbine maintenance market (33.6 b$ ) is about quarter the size of the sales market (139 b$ ). As electrolyzers degrade, similar relative size of the maintenance market can be envisioned for the PtX industry, in particular for the electrolyzers, as they wear comparatively faster. Predictive maintenance is thus likely to have great impact on the earnings of the PtX technology providers.
  • Being able to monitor the technology in the field also adds substantial value for the technology provider, as rather expensive large-scale experiments will be undertaken at the end-users. Making in-the-field monitoring available could thus accelerate R&D for the technology providers, as the cost in this way is shared with the end-users.
  • The implementation of the SOEL technology would also lead to a more efficient sector, as SOEL is >25 % more efficient than the competing technologies2. The savings would not only be the electrolysis plants but for the entire PtX value chain, and would be on everything from renewable power installations, less use of land and finally for the power infrastructure – all increasing the sustainability of PtX. This can be expected to occur already from 2026, where Topsoe is targeting the first 100 MW installation, which will soon extend 500 MW and later 5 GW, given their collaboration with First Ammonia.

Project contacts

Henrik Lund Frandsen_cropped

Henrik Lund Frandsen

DTU Energy
Professor
Rafael Nogueira Nakashima

Rafael Nogueira Nakashima

Technical University of Denmark
Assistant professor

Related projects

View all projects

Stay updated on MissionGreenFuels

Subscribe to the MissionGreenFuels newsletter to receive updates on funding calls, portfolio projects, events, and insights from the MissionGreenFuels partnership. The newsletter is published four to six times a year, with additional updates when relevant.

The green fuel value chain and cross-cutting themes

Resource procurement (Input)
Identification, sourcing, and supply of biomass, CO₂, green electricity, or waste materials (feedstock) used as input for fuel production.
Fuel production
Processes that transform the basic energy resources into primary energy carriers (e.g. hydrogen).
Refining and upgrading
Processes that purify, enhance or synthesize fuels/hydrogen to meet specific quality and performance standards.
Storage
Technologies and systems for containing larger quantities of fuels (methanol, ammonia, hydrogen, SAF) over time.
Transport
Logistics and infrastructure for moving fuels from production to consumption sites, covering pipelines, trucks, ships, etc.
Distribution
End-point delivery for supplying fuels to users (e.g. fuelling stations, industrial supply lines, on-site storage).
Utilisation
Application of the fuels in end-use sectors such as heavy transport, aviation, shipping, and power generation in industry. The end-user is responsible for sourcing of energy/fuels, as well as new technologies and assets capable of utilising these, often with the purpose of reducing GHG emissions and environmental impact. Furthermore, end-users are also responsible for meeting new regulatory requirements and handling all technical and commercial risks related to the application of new and more expensive energy, following the energy transition. Utilisation includes extensive field testing of new technologies and fuels to overcome technical challenges and test production and supply chain infrastructure.
Post-treatment and recycling
Handling of byproducts, residues or emissions, and processes for material recovery or environmental management.
Safety and standardisation
Development and application of safety protocols, technical standards and certifications to ensure secure handling and interoperability.
Systems integration / sector coupling
Linking fuel production and use with other energy systems and sectors (e.g. power-to-x, grid balancing, industrial symbiosis) to optimise efficiency and resilience. Primarily an analytical focus.
Community work and stakeholder involvement
Engagement of local actors, citizens and industry stakeholders to support implementation, acceptability and social sustainability.
Structural frameworks, regulation, and markets
Analysis, development and test of policy, regulatory structures, incentive mechanisms, and market models to enable deployment and scaling.